Our reader, Anirudh Mehta, discovered a bug in Google Talk’s invisible status feature available in its Gmail Chat version. If use smartly, you can figure out if the girl next door is really invisible or avoiding you.Continue reading : Bug in Google Talk’s Invisible Status FeatureHere are steps:
- Set the chat as off the record with target user (how?). This can be done only when the other user is online. (need help?)
- Now try sending chat to that user when he is invisible or offline.
- If he is invisible, then he will receive chat.
- But if he Is offline, then you will receive error “username did not receive your chat”.
Posted by Rahul Bansal @ Welcome To Devils Workshop
Filed under : “
Windows Live Messenger
Yahoo Messenger
Google Talk
Skype
AIM
ICQ
Other IM Clients
Multi-protocol
Web-based Multi-protocol
IM Related
Mobile
Webcam Tools
Webmaster Tools
My name is Deniz Akay and I live in
wow. thanks for that.. will try if it works..
It works Man n its great though there are sum restrictions but hey [b]sumthin is better than Nothing.[b]
Million Thnx.
it's not completely OK.
i want to kno abt the invisible users on gmail chat withour sending any msg to him/her and without going "off the record". means just a scanner which can detect invisible users. is thr any..???
I'm not sure if this works or not but I hope it will work. I'm looking forward for this.
it doent work
it works!
ohhh great.. and why don´t you say "hello , i am trying to know if you are online, i am a stupid" .. come on !! this sucks.
you can also find some extra features on the labs version of other Google products which allows you to make yourself invisible but it does not always override the gtalk client software if you have that installed
http://mwolk.com/blog/how-to-stay-and-chat-invisible-and-as-offline-in-gtalk/
finally a way to detect invisible user in gmail without sending them any message, check out my blog
http://sharathb814.blogspot.com/2009/05/find-invisible-users-in-gmail-gtalk.html
Thanks,
Sharath
It works dude.. Nice.. "Every thing can be cracked.." This is proved yet again..